On the Nochka-chen-ru-wong Proof of Cartan’s Conjecture
نویسندگان
چکیده
In 1982–83, E. Nochka proved a conjecture of Cartan on defects of holomorphic curves in P relative to a possibly degenerate set of hyperplanes. This was further explained by W. Chen in his 1987 thesis, and subseqently simplified by M. Ru and P.-M. Wong in 1991. The proof involved assigning weights to the hyperplanes. This paper provides a mild simplification of the proof of the construction of the weights, by construing the “Nochka diagram” of Ru and Wong as a convex hull. In 1982 and 1983, E. Nochka proved a conjecture of Cartan on defects of holomorphic curves in P relative to a possibly degenerate set of hyperplanes. This was further explained by W. Chen in his thesis [C], and subsequently simplified by M. Ru and P.-M. Wong [R-W]. This note offers some further simplifications, consisting of defining the Nochka polygon in terms of a convex hull (described in a previous letter [V 1]), and rewording the combinatorics to use linear subspaces of P instead of sets of hyperplanes (motivated by the rephrasing of ([R-W], Thm. 2.2) in [S]). This note only addresses the proof of the existence of the Nochka weights (Theorem 3). For details on the remainder of Nochka’s proof, see [R-W]; simplified versions are also given in [S] and [V 2]. Let H1, . . . ,Hq be hyperplanes in P k , not necessarily distinct, but in n-subgeneral position; i.e., there exists an embedding of P as a linear subspace of P and (distinct) hyperplanes H ′ 1, . . . ,H ′ q in general position in P n such that Hi = H ′ i ∩ P k for all i . For linear subspaces L ⊆ P , define α(L) = #{i : Hi ⊇ L} and recall that codimL denotes the codimension of L in P ; i.e., codimL = k−dimL . Also, by convention, let codim ∅ = k + 1 . For linear subspaces L ⊆ P let P (L) = (α(L), codimL) ∈ R . Supported by NSF grants DMS-9304899, DMS-0200892, and DMS-0500512. 1
منابع مشابه
On the Closed-Form Solution of a Nonlinear Difference Equation and Another Proof to Sroysang’s Conjecture
The purpose of this paper is twofold. First we derive theoretically, using appropriate transformation on x(n), the closed-form solution of the nonlinear difference equation x(n+1) = 1/(±1 + x(n)), n ∈ N_0. The form of solution of this equation, however, was first obtained in [10] but through induction principle. Then, with the solution of the above equation at hand, we prove a case ...
متن کاملOn the oriented perfect path double cover conjecture
An oriented perfect path double cover (OPPDC) of a graph $G$ is a collection of directed paths in the symmetric orientation $G_s$ of $G$ such that each arc of $G_s$ lies in exactly one of the paths and each vertex of $G$ appears just once as a beginning and just once as an end of a path. Maxov{'a} and Ne{v{s}}et{v{r}}il (Discrete Math. 276 (2004) 287-294) conjectured that ...
متن کاملA short proof of the maximum conjecture in CR dimension one
In this paper and by means of the extant results in the Tanaka theory, we present a very short proof in the specific case of CR dimension one for Beloshapka's maximum conjecture. Accordingly, we prove that each totally nondegenerate model of CR dimension one and length >= 3 has rigidity. As a result, we observe that the group of CR automorphisms associated with each of such models contains onl...
متن کاملPartial proof of Graham Higman's conjecture related to coset diagrams
Graham Higman has defined coset diagrams for PSL(2,ℤ). These diagrams are composed of fragments, and the fragments are further composed of two or more circuits. Q. Mushtaq has proved in 1983 that existence of a certain fragment γ of a coset diagram in a coset diagram is a polynomial f in ℤ[z]. Higman has conjectured that, the polynomials related to the fragments are monic and for a fixed degree...
متن کاملA Brief Determination of Certain Class of Power Semicircle Distribution
In this paper, we give a new and direct proof for the recently proved conjecture raised in Soltani and Roozegar (2012). The conjecture can be proved in a few lines via the integral representation of the Gauss-hypergeometric function unlike the long proof in Roozegar and Soltani (2013).
متن کامل